28
April 2008
Toast Wars
There are several points I would like to make in this post, the first—but by no means the most
important—is that finding amusing differences between the US and the UK is becoming a bit difficult. Having been here six years, I think it's normal to see Marmite on the supermarket shelves and occasionally find the market square filled with men dressed in knickerbockers, feathers and jingle-bells prancing around and hitting at each other with big sticks. Thankfully circumstances, even now, occasionally conspire to illuminate certain oddities, such as the Brits not knowing what a
'John Hancock' is or their inability to recognize a
Charlie Horse if it bit them in the leg.
So it is with the subject of this post: soon after arriving in Britain, I began to notice a curious item on the table in many restaurants. The locals referred to it as a toast rack, but in reality it merely served as an efficient toast cooler. I grudgingly accepted its presence and occasionally thought of posting about it but wasn't
sure if they existed in America and I simply hadn't been paying attention. Recently, however, "Lynneguist" of
Separated by a Common Language posted about this curiosity and sparked a debate that might
lead you to believe any possible war between the US and UK won't be about foreign policy or
the Kyoto Protocol, but over the 'proper' way to serve toast.
Turns out—and how I managed to live here all this time and not have figured this out on my own is a complete
mystery—that the British have such a phobia about soggy toast that they invented this little gadget to neatly separate each slice, allowing all residue humidity to escape, thereby ensuring each piece will be crispy, free of dampness and, naturally, stone cold. This latter bit they don't seem to mind; they appear perfectly content to sacrifice heat
as long as it guarantees an absence of moisture.
I (and most Americans, it seems) don't like cold toast, and remain willing to risk a bit of accumulated condensation by stacking or covering the slices to keep them warm. In fact, to my thinking, toast should be just a bit moist, like a fresh baked biscuit.
Now, saying I don't like cold toast is, perhaps, not stating my case forcefully enough, so let's put it another way: liking cold toast is a physical impossibility as it does not exist. Cold toast is an oxymoron, like "Microsoft Works." Toast, by its very definition, is warm. Once it cools, it is just a rock-hard and unappealing slice of burnt, processed wheat that at one time in its unhappy life had been toast. What appears in the cooling rack during breakfast is, well, I don't know what it is, but I know it isn't toast.
This is where the line is drawn, and it appears even the best efforts of Neville Chamberlain would fail to achieve peace in our time (not that he was
brilliant at it while he was alive, mind you); on the one side, the Brits, insisting that toast should be crispy and dry, on the other, the Americans, strident in their belief that it has to be warm, and pushing us closer toward breakfast Armageddon is the waitress, proffering plates of butter pats they appear to store alongside the liquid nitrogen.
I may be a bit biased here, but I believe the arguments put forward by Brits in favor (or favour, if you prefer) of the toast rack and against stacking are specious, at best. "If you eat it quickly, it will be warm," they say. Yes, but only if it arrives at your table while still warm. And by the same token, a stack of toast, if eaten promptly, will not have a chance to become soggy. (And if this condition is so anathema to the British, how then did they develop a penchant for pouring baked beans over their toast?)
So, as you can see, when it comes to serving toast, the Americans are clearly right and the British undeniably wrong.
When you take into account the fact that my wife and I eat toast for breakfast practically every morning on the weekends, it's a bit surprising this issue never came to light prior to this. It seems we escaped confrontation only because our morning toast comes straight out of the toaster and is buttered immediately. We also benefit from using a soft, yellowish, looks-sort-of-like-butter-but-might-not-kill-you-as-quickly type of concoction that, unlike the blocks of yellow ice popular in restaurants, spreads quickly and easily and doesn't require you to chisel butter shavings onto your toast.
It was a false truce, however, and once the subject was broached the discussion did not progress far before it became apparent that, despite six years of marital bliss, we sat firmly on opposite sides of the toast fence.
I'm not saying we approached anything like 'irreconcilable differences' but for
breakfast the next morning, we had pancakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's New . . . ?
It's Blue Bell season, one of the many reasons I like living here. A quick bit of research (think Google) assures me there are Blue Bells in the States, but I never remember seeing any, and certainly not on the scale I see them here.
The reason is, England in general (and, I like to think, the south east in particular) has a remarkably favorable climate and habitat for Blue Bells, so this time of year is always something special. In addition to watching the violet blur carpeting the forest floor just off the roadside as the bus whizzes along, you can visit any one of a number of gardens, parks or estates to see huge swaths of hillside covered in little purple flowers.
It's an amazement, and the only disappointment is that any photo (or, at least any that I take) cannot do them justice. The amazing hues, the dappling of sunlight, the budding tree all seem so
insignificant when viewed in a photo. The only thing for it is to come
see them in person.
Now is the time, in case you've been waiting: air fare $600, hotel $250, drinking in the pub $75, admission to Wakehurst Place $19.50 (ouch!), seeing the Blue Bells—price… No, do the math: it's about $1,000 (if you include tips), but still worth it.
28 April 2008
Links
I have to confess to being clueless when it comes to exchanging blog
links; I don't even know what blog rolling is, much less how to do
it. (Does it involve logs?) If you want me to link to
your site, drop me a line, or a comment:
Expat Library
Rules Britannia - by Expat Mum
This book should be required reading for anyone staying in England longer than it takes to
change planes at Heathrow Airport. An amazing and entertaining compilation of the differences in
our seemingly similar cultures.
Expat Links
@llo' Expat - Connecting expats around the globe
A Forum for Americans and Brits
American Expats In The UK
Americans living in the UK
Interviews with people living abroad
The Online Expatriate Community
Expat Blogs
Expat Mum -
Observations of a Brit wife in the USA
What Do I Know
- Wasn't sure whether to put this with the expats or the writers
Observations from Queensland
Getting It Wrong in Japan
- A Brit commenting on the British
City Slicker
- Another Brit commenting on the British
Two Crabs
- A wanderlust expat couple exploring this little marble we call Earth
Everyday Stranger
- An Ordinary Girl in Extraordinary Circumstances
Separated by a Common Language
Jeremy and Katy –
Americans living in London
Pond Hopper
– The misadventures of a Jersey Girl who crossed the pond
A View from England
The Vol Abroad
- The rantings and musings of a Tennessee expat and long term London resident
Writing links
Absolute Write – The essential resource for writers
Writer's Digest Magazine
The Writer Magazine
JA Konrath - I won't bother posting any writing tips on my site; go look at Joe's
Julia Spencer Flemming – Adirondack Adventures
Tracy Chevalier – Great 'period' writer
Writer's Blogs
JAKonrath – A newbie's guide to publishing
Melanie Lynne Hauser – Adventures of a Super mom
JT Ellison – The Tao of JT
Seth's Blog – Seth's Advice for Writers
Cabbages and Kings – A diary by the authors of the Louis Kincaid series
The Life of Writing – Making the switch from enthusiastic amateur to paid professional
|
|